Canada surpasses Russia as China’s largest lumber supplier

0

Low price is factor in Middle Kingdom accounting for 26 per cent of Canadian wood exports

By Gordon Hamilton, Vancouver Sun May 10, 2012

Led by British Columbia, Canada emerged as the largest exporter of lumber in the world to China in 2011, surpassing Russia as the Middle Kingdom’s No. 1 source for lumber.

“We are king of the hill,” Gerry Van Leeuwen, of the Vancouver consultants International Wood Markets Group, said Tuesday. “We are No. 1 in total lumber imports into China.”

The trend has continued in 2012, Van Leeuwen said. According to the latest statistics from China Customs, Canada supplied 1.45 million cubic metres (about 900 million board feet) of soft-wood lumber during the first quarter of 2012, corralling 47 per cent of the market share for softwood lumber in China. Russia is second at 35 per cent.

Softwood lumber – lumber made from coniferous species like spruce, pine and fir – is the dominant wood product manufactured by British Columbia sawmills. B.C. softwood lumber accounts for about 95 per cent of all Canadian softwood shipments to China, making this province China’s largest global supplier, surpassing Russia, which exports both hardwood and softwood lumber, for the first time.

International Wood Markets tracks Chinese statistics and on Tuesday released a report, China Bulletin, on the latest figures.

Canada’s emergence as the top supplier has been meteoric. In 2011, Canada shipped 6.8 million cubic metres of lumber to China, up 20-fold from 2006, when Canada shipped only 331,000 cubic metres of lumber.

“A number of issues have driven our success but one of the biggest ones is price,” Van Leeuwen said. “As the North American lumber market collapsed in 2005/06 and lumber prices went south – from US$400 a thousand board feet to US$188 – suddenly our lumber became very attractive.”

When the U.S. housing market eventually improves, Van Leeuwen said he thinks B.C. sawmillers will not abandon their new markets in China.

“We are subject to this softwood lumber export tax. We have been burdened by this for the last four or five years and I think Canadian lumber producers are much more conscious of the dangers of being too dependent on the U.S. market. So we think they won’t move as quickly.”

If prices in the U.S. increase significantly, however, it’s unknown how B.C. producers will react, he said.

China’s total demand for wood has been growing at a rate of 10 to 15 per cent a year. It has been buying logs from around the Pacific Rim to meet that demand, pushing up log prices globally, which made the depressed price of B.C. lumber even more attractive, Van Leeuwen said. He added that China now accounts for 26 per cent of Canadian lumber exports, not enough to influence the price significantly. The U.S. accounts for 63 per cent of Canadian lumber exports.

B.C. is also a major exporter of logs to China but it pales in comparison to Russia and New Zealand. Russia exported three million cubic metres of logs to China in the first quarter of 2012 while B.C. exported 594,000 cubic metres during the same period.

But housing construction statistics show a dramatic slowdown is under-way in China. Floor space in newly-started residential buildings dropped by 5.2 per cent in the first quarter of 2012.

International Wood Markets is holding a Global Softwood Log and Lumber conference Wednesday in Vancouver, part of the weeklong Global Forest Products Leadership Summit now underway in the city.

 

ghamilton@vancouversun.com Blog: vancouversun.com/industry

 

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Quebec joins California in cap and trade market

0

Thursday, May 10, 2012



California may not have to go it alone on cap-and-trade after all.

Under rules proposed Wednesday by state regulators, the Canadian province of Quebec will link its cap-and-trade system to California’s in November. The joint market will allow businesses in both California and Quebec to trade permits to emit the greenhouse gases behind global warming.

California officials who have spent years developing a carbon market have always hoped to include other states and provinces. But most of California’s potential partners have either dropped the idea or dragged their feet. And hopes of a national cap-and-trade system faded after climate-change legislation died in Congress in 2010.

‘Significant advance’

“Linking with Quebec is a significant advance in California’s efforts to fight climate change and steer our economy toward a clean energy future,” said Mary Nichols, chairwoman of the California Air Resources Board. “Linking provides more options to California businesses and lays the groundwork for other partners to join with us.”

The board, which is developing California’s carbon market, Wednesday proposed detailed regulations for ensuring that greenhouse gas emission permits – called allowances – are interchangeable in California and Quebec. The board is scheduled to vote on the rules at its June 28 meeting.

If they are approved, the first linked auction of allowances for Quebec and California companies would take place in November.

Cap-and-trade systems are designed to cut emissions over time, at a lower price than other potential tools such as a carbon tax. Such systems set limits on greenhouse gas emissions and create markets for companies to trade the right to produce those gases. Companies that cut their emissions below targets set by the state can sell their excess allowances to other companies.

Europe has problems

Europe already has a cap-and-trade system, but its introduction has been plagued by problems. Still, other countries including Australia, New Zealand and South Korea are developing their own carbon markets.

Once embraced by both Democrats and Republicans, cap and trade has become a partisan issue, with many conservatives adamantly opposed to it.

“The cap-and-trade system is acknowledged as one of the most efficient and least costly economic tools available to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and is an important instrument in our transition to a green and prosperous economy,” said Pierre Arcand, Quebec’s minister for sustainable development, environment and parks. “Quebec is optimistic that its linking with California will be followed by many other partners.”

David R. Baker is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. dbaker@sfchronicle.com

This article appeared on page A – 9 of the San Francisco Chronicle

 

Biofuels in the balance as EU fails to conclude carbon impacts

0

Officials cannot agree on impact of indirect land use change rules, which could wipe out biodiesel in Europe

By Will Nichols

03 May 2012

Biofuel producers have been “left in limbo” by EU policymakers’ failure to agree on how to measure the industry’s environmental impact at a meeting in Brussels yesterday.

Officials were attempting to thrash out a method of accounting for indirect land use change (ILUC), which occurs when areas are cleared to grow crops for energy. Green groups claim this has the potential to raise emissions and push up food prices, negating the emissions savings that should result from switching from fossil fuels to biofuels.

The European Commission was expected to produce guidelines this summer delineating those biofuels that are thought to be more emission heavy, such as biodiesel, from fuels like ethanol.

But the negotiations have reportedly become bogged down with outbreaks of in-fighting between the Climate Commission, which wants ILUC to be considered in the new rules, and the Energy Department, which does not.

A decision is now expected by the end of the year, but the wait leaves producers uncertain as to the future of their industry. Europe’s €13bn biofuel industry is heavily dependent on biodiesel made from palm, soy, and rapeseed feedstocks, which ILUC factors could almost totally rule out in the long term.

However, restricting the use of biodesel would make it very hard for the EU to hit its target of achieving a 10 per cent share of green energy in road transport by 2020, most of which is expected to come from biofuels. A related fuel directive also requires oil companies to cut the carbon content of their fuels by six per cent by the end of the decade, which is also likely to mean an increase in blending biofuel with standard fuel.

The Commission is debating three options: the first would see all biofuels forced to save 60 per cent of emissions compared with standard fuel from 2016, a rise on the current 35 per cent requirement. While this is likely to rule out some biofuels made from palm and soy, rapeseed could still make the cut, despite some estimates that rate it as causing greater net emissions than crude oil.

The second option is backed by environmentalists and would introduce ILUC factors for individual crops, along with incentives for second generation biofuels, which are made from agricultural residues, waste, or algae and are considered significantly less carbon intensive.

However, the most likely solution remains a compromise proposal combining elements of the two rival approaches.

Clare Wenner, head of renewable transport at the Renewable Energy Association (REA), told BusinessGreen the Commission had to finalise its decision urgently so the industry could get on with the business of decarbonising the transport sector.

“We need some kind of a decision,” she said. “Every option has merits and demerits but we need to make a decision and help industry move on.

“The bigger picture here is decarbonising transport. If you make the best the enemy of the good, people won’t do anything.”

However, Kenneth Richter, biofuels campaigner at Friends of the Earth, argued that if the renewable transport targets could not be achieved sustainably, they must be revoked.

“We’re disappointed there’s no progress,” he told BusinessGreen. “Every year there is no decision biofuels continue to be incentivised when the majority, particularly biodiesel, don’t save emissions but potentially increase them more than fossil fuels.

“It’s encouraging there seems to be an understanding that addressing ILUC is essential – the fight seems to be over how to do it. We’ve argued the transport targets [as they stand] cannot be met sustainably [and] need to be urgently reviewed.”

Company develops local heating technology with biochar byproduct

0
By Lisa Gibson | May 09, 2012
  • Whitfield Biochar is developing a biomass thermal technology designed to supply local heating demand wherever it is deployed.  PHOTO: WHITEFIELD BIOCHAR LLC

Washington-based Whitfield Biochar LLC is developing a biomass thermal technology that can use multiple feedstocks to produce syngas, as well as a biochar product for soil fertility improvement. It also is designed to be scalable and meet local thermal demand.

The process can use almost all types of waste streams, but the company prefers to use rice hulls, chicken litter, grass pellets or dried sewage sludge, according to Jock Gill, marketing and communications representative for Whitfield Biochar. Wood pellets can also be used.

“We are able to deliver predictable, repeatable, and consistent results as we are able to control the reactor temperature to within 1 percent of the set point, typically 500 degrees C, as well as the residence time of the material in the reactor,” Gill said. The system is a continuous flow pyrolysis unit, dubbed the Whitfield Continuous Feed Biochar Reactor.

The company is in the late development stages, he added, and plans to install its first beta units in the fourth quarter of this year. Bill said the company expects to install the unit at locations in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and California.

“Test sites will be using the thermal energy co-product to displace fossil fuels and the biochar co-product for soil regeneration, as well as nutrient and storm water management and remediation,” Gill said. “We also expect a test of highway storm water management of heavy metal run-offs.”

In at least one case, the system will deliver heat to its users at or below the cost of natural gas, he added.

VCs still funding next-gen biofuel companies

0

By  May. 9, 2012, 11:21am PT

Despite continued struggles for next-gen biofuel makers, venture capitalists are still putting money into startups, particularly when it comes to follow-on rounds. On Wednesday EdeniQ, which was spun out of AltraBiofuels in 2008 to focus on cellulosic ethanol processing, announced that it has raised another round of more than $30 million in equity and debt from investors including Kleiner Perkins, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, and The Westly Group.

A large ethanol producer and subsidiary of Koch Industries, Flint Hills Resources Renewables, also joined EdeniQ’s round as a new investor. Comerica and ATEL Ventures provided the debt. Flint is interested in EdeniQ because the startup has technology that can help a corn ethanol producer transition to cellulosic biofuels, which are made from energy crops or waste and are widely considered the future of biofuels.

EdeniQ originally raised $30 million when it launched back in 2008, and later raised $12.4 million, so the company’s total investment is close to $75 million. AltraBiofuels was also backed by substantial money — some hundreds of millions of dollars.

Cellulosic ethanol is facing a really tough road in the U.S. Amyris, which was one of the leaders a few short years ago after it went public, has hit a wall and recently reorganized its management team. MIT Tech Review reported that Amyris was very far away from being able to produce biodiesel profitably, leading to the company getting out of the biofuel business for the time being. Amyris’ stock is trading at $1.96 per share, far below its $16 per share price debut.

Another charticle from the MIT Tech Review this week shows just how far away the U.S. is from meeting its (ridiculous) renewable fuel mandates, particularly because very little cellulosic ethanol is being produced. Biofuel exec, and blogger, Robert Rapier tweeted to me that he predicts that the actual amount of cellulosic ethanol production in 2012 will be less than 5 million gallons (and probably less than 2 million gallons). The EPA is predicting the industry will make 10 million gallons 2012, down from the amazingly-off prediction goal that the industry would make 500 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol in 2012.

NMU Wood Biomass Power Plant

0

Thu 5/3/12 5:59PM / last updated Thu 5/3/12 6:12PM

Northern Michigan University is building a power plant based on wood biomass. The plant project has been on the drawing board since 2004. The school held a groundbreaking this morning, but construction started in March.
“This is not just a historical moment for Northern, but for me as the university’s president,” said NMU President Les Wong. “One of the first project ideas I heard about when I came to NMU was of a renewable energy facility. So for as long as I’ve been here, which is now eight years, this has been a strategic goal of the university and we appreciate the partnership we have with Johnson Controls to make it a reality. NMU is committed to being a campus that works hard at its sustainability measures and this facility will help us within that area.”
Cloyd says that coming out of the recession, he’s excited the project is getting underway to not only continue the school’s commitment to renewable energy but also to add local jobs.
The facility will produce up to 87 percent of the campus steam consumption currently supplied by burning fossil fuel at the adjacent Ripley Heating Plant. It will also produce up to 16 percent of the university’s electricity needs, reducing the amount that must be purchased from the Marquette Board of Light and Power.
The project is funded by internal or bond proceeds paid back through operational cost savings guaranteed by Johnson Controls. In addition to the new construction, work will address $800,000 in long-term maintenance at the Ripley plant, which relies primarily on natural gas with fuel oil as a backup and will be used to meet peak steam demand.
“By being able to burn multiple types of fuel, the university has a critical ability to fiscally react to significant changes in the fuel source marketplace,” said Brian Cloyd, chair of the NMU Board of Trustees. “The new plant will also incorporate the best available control technology and meet federal EPA and Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment standards.”
The new plant won’t replace the existing Ripley Heating Plant but will instead operate alongside it. It should help reduce NMU’s operating costs. It’ll produce more than 85% of the heat needed on campus and about one–sixth of NMU’s electricity.
The plant will cost $16.4 million. NMU officials expect to do the first test burn next January. It’s scheduled to be fully operational in June 2013.
Posted by: Mike Hoey

Biomass project picks up steam

0

Published on May 3, 2012
Nancy King

Arrival of steam turbine generator marks ‘major milestone’

POINT TUPPER — Construction of a $208-million biomass cogeneration plant has reached a significant milestone with the arrival of the steam turbine generator that will produce electricity.

Topics : 
Nova Scotia Power Inc. , NewPage Port Hawkesbury , MitsubishiJapan , Halifax , San Diego

Nova Scotia Power officials invited members of the media on a tour of the construction site Thursday, which is located at the former NewPage Port Hawkesbury mill site.

The facility will see biomass burned to produce electricity. It is to generate about 60 megawatts of electricity a year, enough to power about 50,000 homes.

“We did hit a major milestone last week when we placed our steam turbine and generator on its pedestals — so its final resting place — in the steam turbine building at site,” said Roger Burton, NSPI’s senior director for projects, technical and construction.

“Once those pieces of equipment are in place, it allows some of the larger construction projects to start.”

For example, Burton said the large and high pressure steam piping can now be connected to those pieces of equipment and the electrical connections to the generator can begin. He said those are some of the single largest contracts on the project.

The steam turbine generator was constructed by Mitsubishi Power Systems in Japan. In the wake of last year’s earthquake and tsunami, Mitsubishi invoked a contract condition excusing it from meeting obligations if it encountered circumstances beyond its control. Despite that, it was delivered on schedule.

Significant planning had to go into the delivery of the turbine generator to the site. The steam turbine weighs about 190 tonnes and the generator weighs about 70 tonnes. The unit was shipped by boat to Halifax where it was placed in a special rail car that had to be brought in from San Diego.

“The unit (was loaded) onto that car in a special orientation so we could get it to site here and minimize the amount of handling so that we could reduce the risk of having an issue of getting it into its final resting place,” Burton said. “That required a fair bit of logistics.”

The plant is expected to begin producing power by the end of the first quarter of next year. That is a couple of months behind the project’s original timetable. The project was somewhat delayed last year when NewPage Port Hawkesbury, which was going to construct and operate the facility for Nova Scotia Power Inc., shut down indefinitely and entered creditor protection. NSPI subsequently took over control of the project.

“Not only this contract, but any contract we do where a third party is managing, we always have a contingency plan in case we need to take over a project, and so when the insolvency happened, we invoked that plan,” Burton said.

The number of jobs on site during the construction phase fluctuates, but Burton said there are currently close to 150 on site, and that figure could get closer to 200 at peak.

Environmental groups have raised concerns about the potential of increased clearcutting. They have also said the project will increase the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in the province and that it won’t reduce the amount of coal burned for electricity in Nova Scotia.

When it was announced, it was projected that the biomass plant would create about 150 new forestry jobs.

 

nking@cbpost.com

NTE Energy secures US patent for biomass hybrid renewable energy technology

0

CTBR Staff Writer

Published 01 May 2012

NTE Energy has secured a patent from the US Patent & Trademark Office for its biomass hybrid renewable energy technology.

 

Patent number US 8,161,724 was for the technology that revolutionizes the production of renewable energy by allowing the simultaneous operation of a biomass energy cycle in concert with a traditional power plant.

NTE Energy will utilize the new technology in the development, construction and operation of new hybrid renewable power generation facilities located throughout the US.

NTE Energy president and CEO Seth Shortlidge said the US patent represents a game-changing moment for the renewable energy industry.

“Our technology will help generators provide reliable, low cost, efficient electricity, while creating new economic opportunities and jobs,” Shortlidge said.

“NTE Energy’s hybrid technology creates significant benefits by decreasing use of fossil fuels in power generation, increasing domestic renewable energy production, and providing the forestry and agriculture sectors with solutions for their biomass residuals.”

NTE Energy Sales and Marketing executive vice president Mark Daley said hybrid technology allows utilities to provide renewable, baseload power from a native biomass fuel that also helps to diversify the regional generation portfolio.

“Each facility will also create more than 120 permanent jobs, with hundreds of additional construction jobs to build each plant,” Daley said.

NTE Energy’s patented hybrid technology integrates biomass and conventional steam electric generating technologies into a single efficient hybrid renewable power generation facility.

CoolPlanet Biofuels: Too good to be true?

0
Published May 01, 2012
CoolPlanet Biofuels: Too good to be true?

Imagine a company that says it can produce virtually limitless amounts of cheap gasoline, create arable land for food production and solve the climate crisis — all at once.

That’s the promise of CoolPlanet BioFuels.

Mike Cheiky, the company’s founder and CEO, spoke about CoolPlanet’s “negative emissions technology” at Brainstorm Green, FORTUNE’s conference about business and the environment. Yes, negative emissions.

Does that mean, I asked him, that the more you drive a car powered by CoolPlanet’s biofuels, the more CO2 will be pulled out of the air? Yes, he replied.

Mike Cheiky

“The world doesn’t have too much carbon,” Cheiky explained. The problem’s is that the carbon’s in the wrong place. There’s too much in the atmosphere, causing global warming,  and not enough in the soil. Essentially, Cool Planet has a plan to use plants to remove it from the air and then restore it to the land.

Before you decide that this is too good to be true, you should know that Cheiky, a veteran entrepreneur, has persuaded Google, General Electric, BP, ConocoPhillips, NRG Energy, Exelon and venture capital firms Shea Ventures and North Bridge Venture Partners to invest millions of dollars — he won’t say how many millions — in CoolPlanet Biofuels.

“We have been poked and prodded so many ways by so many people,” Cheiky told me. “GE sent 17 people to do their due diligence at a time when we had only 15 employees.”

These investors wrote him checks, he added, because of his track record. “I’ve done six start-ups in my career,” he went on, “and I’ve never had a down round. They’ve all been very successful.”

Cheiky does not lack self-confidence. He and his wife, Charity, started Ohio Scientific, one of the world’s first personal computer companies, in 1975, right after he graduated from college. “I was very successful as an early pioneer in the microcomputer era,” he told me.

He built an electric car in the early 1990s but subsequently decided that “we would not be able to deploy electric vehicles fast enough to combat climate change.” More recently, Cheiky founded Zinc Matrix Power, which became ZPower, a company that makes small rechargeable silver-zinc batteries for mobile applications.

He also started Transonic Combustion, which aims to dramatically improve the efficiency of the internal combustion engine. Venrock and Khosla Ventures invested in Transonic, and former GM exec Bob Lutz sits on its board. Cheiky is no longer involved in ZPower or Transonic — a sign that he is probably better at starting companies than managing them. He says he left Transonic when he realized that “just making the engines more efficient wasn’t going to do the job. I had to crack the problem of the fuel.”

The concept behind CoolPlanet is simple. Begin with biomass, in the form of wood chips, corn cobs or fast-growing crops like miscanthus. Process it through a bio-fractionator using a proprietary thermal/chemical process. Make gasoline that’s identical to the fuel pumped into your car. Then take a carbon-rich byproduct, a solid biochar, and bury it to sequester carbon or use it to enhance soil. (Here’s a long interview with Mike Rocke, VP of business development at CoolPlanet BioFuels, explaining the process.  I’ve also pasted an explanation from the company website, below.)

Cheiky says that CoolPlanet Biofuels will be able to make gasoline for $1 a gallon. Yes, $1 a gallon. The company then will deploy biochar to make more land on which more crops can be grown to make more gasoline, and so forth.

He said:

We have a sustainable model. We can power the world, literally, provide all the liquid fuels need for the world, with land that we can create, basically. You’ve got to take carbon out of the atmosphere and put it back into the ground to have more fertile land to grow more food crops and fuel crops at the same time.

In a decade or two, he told me, as the company gets to massive scale, this new way of making fuels could not only destroy OPEC but offset all of the world’s carbon emissions.

Can this  be true? It’s hard to know, because CoolPlanet is a bit of a black box. The company won’t get into the details of its technology, which is understandable; that’s its competitive advantage. Cheiky also won’t say how much money he has raised, which is unusual; most startups are transparent about their financing. He was also a bit vague when asked about how much water will be needed to grow the feedstock crops. Whether biochar can be used to sequester carbon, and for how long, is yet another unanswered question. (See my blogpost, The carbon negative economy)

Yet Cheiky says the company’s technology is already working, albeit on a small scale, near its headquarters in Camarillo, Calif. His plan is to build a commercial plant somewhere in the midwest next year. Initially, the plant will probably run on waste products like corn cobs or wood chips, but it can also consume fast-growing plants like miscanthus, switchgrass and sorghum.

“A giant miscanthus can grow 20 feet tall in a season,” Cheiky says. The company said recently that it generated 4,000 gallons of gasoline per acre of biomass  in pilot testing using giant miscanthus.

CoolPlanet Biofuels could be a game-changer — or it could prove to be another disappointment in the biofuels business, which has so far has produced more hype than economic or environmental benefit. Let’s hope that Cheiky is right, and that his company is on to something big.

Here’s how CoolPlanet explains its process:

This breakthrough utilizes mild process conditions, with process temperatures comparable to a kitchen stovetop and maximum pressures comparable to a portable tire inflator. Input biomass is coarsely ground from in field air-dried bioenergy crops with moisture content in the 10-20 percent range. Many advanced energy crops retain root structure for several years and are simply cut down once a year for harvesting, dramatically reducing the carbon intensity of agricultural activities versus other bio sources such as algae farming or wood clearing, chipping and drying. The total process time from biomass to fuel is under one hour. Total energy and biomass feedstock cost using today’s commodity pricing is under 60 cents a gallon.

America’s Biofuel Industry Moves From The Beaker To Barrel, ABFA President Testifies To Congress

0
WASHINGTON, April 26, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ –Testifying today before the U.S. House Small Business Committee’s Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade, Michael McAdams, president, Advanced Biofuels Association – ABFA, said he is, “proud to report to this Committee and to this Congress that America’s domestic advanced biofuels industry has moved from the beaker to the barrel, all in record time. And like most parts of our nation’s economy, small business and American ingenuity are proving to be the engine driving our success.”

McAdams began his testimony, “Let me start today by sharing some of the biggest success stories which have occurred over the last year. The Air Force has flown the F-16/Thunderbirds on a mixture of advanced biofuels, the navy has tested advanced biofuels in ships and vehicles, and the commercial sector has flown the first cross country flight on a blend of renewable jet fuel.”

“We have one member, Dynamic Fuels, producing a million gallons of renewable jet and renewable diesel a week, and have five members who have gone public. In addition, two Colorado member companies are preparing to deploy their innovative technologies in the near term.”

“Gevo, which will produce an isobutanol, a drop in, fungible fuel, will commission its 18 million gallon plant in June of this year in Luverne, Minnesota. While Sundrop Fuels is on target to break ground to build a 50 million gallon cellulosic gasoline plant in Louisiana this year.”

McAdams also noted, “the single most important policy component is the Renewable Fuels Standard, passed overwhelmingly in 2007 by a bipartisan Congress and signed into law by President Bush. Although it is not perfect, it is fundamentally important that the Congress continue to send a strong bipartisan signal of support for this policy if we wish to continue the remarkable progress and grow an advanced biofuels industry.”

He concluded his testimony, “We believe we can and should be a fundamental part of an American energy policy that adopts a portfolio approach. As I have shared with you this morning, we are already starting to see advanced biofuels delivering on its promise of creating new jobs, and helping to strengthen our nation’s economic and energy security.”

ABOUT ABFA – As a leading voice for America’s domestic biofuels industry, the Advanced Biofuels Association, ABFA, represents companies deploying advanced and renewable technologies that are helping drive America’s new economy by creating jobs, reducing our dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuels while fueling a sustainable future for the world. A national organization based in Washington, D.C., the ABFA supports federal investment while encouraging public policies that are consistent, technology neutral, utilize sustainable feedstocks and offer subsidy parity. For more information http://www.advancedbiofuelsassociation.com/

SOURCE Advanced Biofuels Association

Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved